The financial sector has grown ever more interested in crypto-currencies
and the innovative Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) that underpins
them. For central banks, in their role as providers of currency and critical
payments infrastructure, a key area of interest is whether DLTs could be
used to enhance existing payment processes. This article gives a high-level
explanation of how different DLTs can change payments processes. The
answer depends on what form the distributed ledger takes. We identify
four binary elements that determine the different properties of distributed
ledgers and use case studies to evaluate how these elements can improve
on, or fall short of, existing payments infrastructure. We find that Blockchain
– the most well-known DLT that underpins Bitcoin – brings benefits in
terms of the speed of cross-border settlement and improves security by
removing the single point of failure, but has drawbacks in terms of slowing
the speed and increasing the cost of smaller domestic transactions, and
being energy intensive. Some central banks have experimented with other
forms of DLTs that try to capture some of the benefits of Blockchain while
minimising the costs, but so far these DLTs have tended to mimic existing
payment processes and have not demonstrated many additional benefits.